MORE LEFTIST LUNACY ~

If you’re hungry or need some new clothes, Dallas invites  you to come and take what you want… no cost, no penalty for stealing (other than from our Lord) — provided you don’t take more than $750.  Chicago won’t prosecute lying entertainers trying to push a racist agenda, Denver invites  you to come and enjoy pot.  Sanctuary cities won’t follow immigration laws.  The Congress won’t apply hate speech to Muslims elected to public office who lose no opportunity to make anti-Semitic comments.  The entire nation sanctions coveting (putting your hand in someone else’s pocket to take what is theirs for your own benefit) via welfare and illegal immigration laws.  Who is it that keeps saying we are a nation of laws?  Oh, yes.  Those who want to be re-elected to office so they can keep eliminating the laws that hold our nation together.   I feel so sorry for my grandchildren (and yours) and for my new great-granddaughter.  We haven’t left them much of a legacy, have we?  Marilyn M. Barnewall

 

CRIME “PAYS” IN DALLAS, TEXAS !
Rush mentioned this D.A. today.
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:12 PM
Subject: CRIME “PAYS” IN DALLAS, TEXAS !
To:  John Creuzot
       Criminal District Attorney
       Dallas County, Texas
Dear D.A. Creuzot,
Law-and-order is soon to be non-existent in Dallas County, Texas thanks to your “generosity” of “no prosecution” of thieves stealing other people’s property if valued at less than $750.   What gives you the right to financially harm businesses and others who will be forced to suffer such losses?  Under your decision not to prosecute such crimes because one is poor, supermarkets will be prime victims when people come in filling-up-carts and then waving to cashiers as they walk out the door with their “less than $750 in groceries.”  And what’s to stop any from selling these stolen items on the streets?  How will you keep track of this when you say it can’t be done for economic gain?
The next D.A. victims could be department stores where non-paying customers walk in and select clothing, shoes, underwear, cooking items, bath needs, etc.,  under $750 and leave without a care-in-the-world.  No doubt, many will see this as an opportunity to sell such goods for a nice profit while insurance companies are forced to make good on the thefts.  And of course, this will in turn be passed onto their customers with higher premiums.
And have you figured out how this will work at gasoline stations when a non-paying driver pulls in to get gas?  The way gasoline stations work in California, one must first pay for the gas before the pump operates.  Will gas stations in Dallas now be required to install a pump for those needing gas, but can’t pay?
How about restaurants – how will this work?  A non-paying patron sits down, orders a meal under $750, and then following your guidelines claiming poverty, is able to ignore the bill sticking the restaurant owner with the loss of his/her income.
As word gets out that one only has to claim poverty to be “allowed to steal,” more-and-more people needy or otherwise will flock to Dallas to take advantage of such a windfall.  In fact, it will be a great opportunity for flyers to be passed around to those living in tents across California by the thousands, to come to Dallas and take advantage of your largess.  But then this may not happen as no doubt Governor Newsom won’t want to be outdone so he’ll likely up-the-ante and declare anyone stealing $2,500 or less won’t be prosecuted.  At this rate, between the two of you, police will no longer be needed since “crimes won’t be crimes.”
About the only stores left for profit will be gun sellers and holsters as more-and-more people realize they need to be armed and ready to defend their property from what will become the wild west and east and north and south once this madness spreads.
One of the Ten Commandments states:  Thou Shalt Not Steal.  It’s amazing D.A. Creuzot that you’ve taken it upon yourself to harm law-abiding people by aiding-and-abetting thieves.  I would like to think that Dallas voters had no idea that you planned to decriminalize “non-violent crimes committed out-of-necessity” once you assumed office.  Otherwise – if they knowingly elected such a person with twisted thinking, then we surely will become a society where it’s every man for him/herself.
Margie Tiritilli
Sanctuary State

Comment (1)

  1. Dave Johnson

    I was recently in Dallas when all of this was the topic on Talk Radio. At first, I thought it was a joke, but the more I listened, it became clear that this was reality! Very few people thought it was a good idea, but the elected officials didn’t seem to care what the people thought. And if somebody is sane enough to oppose this nonsense, they will be labeled as RACIST. Duh, I wonder why!

Comments are closed.