PAY ATTENTION, CHURCH-GOER!

Vaccination is a Sin
Edward Hendrie
January 13, 2023
Manyattribute the practice of vaccination to the quack doctor Edward Jenner.1 The veryword
vaccine is from the Latin word for cow. Jenner pulled a trick. He renamed cowpox variolae
vaccinae, from which we get the word vaccine. Jenner called the cowpox that he injected into
humans variolae vaccinae.His theorywas that it would make them immune from smallpox. Cowpox
is a disease of cows’ udders and has no relation to smallpox, except they both have the suffix “pox”
in their names. Indeed, variolae vaccinae, which means smallpox of the cow, is a made-up disease.
There is a disease called cowpox and a disease called smallpox, but there is no such disease as
smallpox of the cow.2
Jenner was running a medical scam.
The vaccine practice also involved using variolae (i.e., smallpox) as the inoculating antigen.
But that practice was no more successful than using cowpox. Jenner was intimately aware of the
ineffectiveness of both cowpox and smallpox vaccines. Thomas Morgan writesin his book, Medical
Delusions, that “Jenner soon discovered that vaccination did not give immunity from smallpox,
including some who had been vaccinated by himself and had died from it.”3 Eleanor McBean
explains that “[i]t was not long … before Jenner’s cowpox vaccinations were followed by death and
disease, and that practice was also branded as dangerous and deadly.”4 But Jenner convinced the
world his cowpox vaccine worked because he lied about its efficacy and safety. Jenner’s unceasing
promotion of the practice and subsequent government funding of his research led to compulsory
vaccination in England in 1853, unsurprisingly bringing death and disease to the population.5
The
smallpox vaccine was proven to be unsafe and ineffective. Morgan summarizes the fraudulent
foundations of vaccines.
From its inception until the present day, the vaccination scheme has
been an endless record of lies, deception, fraud, juggling statistics,
and falsifying death certificatesin order to preserve vaccination from
reproach and to secure its continuation. . . and all this after more than
a century of terrible experience, which has demonstrated that
vaccination has killed more than smallpox, besides crippling and
disfiguring millions more.6
But those inconvenient historical details are ignored today. While “routine vaccination
against smallpox among the general public was stopped … the U.S. government has stockpiled
enough smallpox vaccine to vaccinate everyone who would need it if a smallpox outbreak were to
occur.”7 And the smallpox vaccine is still being administered on a case-by-case basis today. The
Mayo Clinic reveals some of the risks of the smallpox vaccine and states that “the risks of the
vaccine outweigh the benefits for most people.”8
The ACAM2000 vaccine uses a live virus that’s like smallpox, but
less harmful. It can sometimes cause serious side effects, such as
infections in the heart or brain. That’s why the vaccine is not given to
everyone. Unless there is a smallpox outbreak, the risks of the
vaccine outweigh the benefits for most people.
9
A little-known fact is that the ineffective and dangerous practice of vaccination did not
actually start with Edward Jenner; it can be traced to Dhanwantari (1,500 B.C.), who was considered
the Vedic Father of Medicine.10 The practice of injecting vaccines is founded on a Hindu religious
superstition. Vaccination is a religious practice that has been proven to be medically ineffective and
harmful.11
The Hindu religion is a heathen religion. God commands us to have nothing to do with
heathen practices. “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove
them.” Ephesians 5:11. We are called on to avoid such practices. “Beware lest any man spoil you
through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and
not after Christ.” Colossians 2:8.
Christians have nothing religiously in common with Hindus. We are not to practice their
heathen religion that masquerades under the guise of medicine. Christians are to separate themselves
from the religious practices of heathens. “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for
what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with
darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an
infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living
God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall
be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch
not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons
and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.” (2 Corinthians 6:14-18)
Vaccines are “usually administered through needle injections.”12 Vaccine active ingredients
are typically viruses or bacteria.13
They are commonly called antigens. An antigen is defined as “a
substance that enters the body and starts a process that can cause disease.”14 The injected antigen is
usually attenuated or inactivated to reduce the risk of disease. The theory behind vaccines promoted
to the public is to “stimulate a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease,
protecting the person from that disease.”15
In addition to the antigens, vaccines contain an adjuvant,
which is intended to stimulate the immune response of the person. Adjuvants are typically heavy
metals like mercury or aluminum, which are neurotoxic.16 Many contaminants find their way into
the vaccinesfromthemanufacturing process, including, but not limited to, antibiotics, formaldehyde,
and aborted fetal tissue.17
Vaccination is a strange medical practice where instead of the doctor trying to cure a person
of a disease to make him well again, the doctor purposely infects a well person with a disease in the
hope that his reaction to the infection will be less than it would otherwise be if he had contracted the
disease through the environment. Vaccination is not without risk. There can be dire consequences
to the practice. There are side effects to vaccination that the medical community calls adverse events
that can range from soreness in the injection site to fever, paralysis, and even death. The expectation,
which is often not realized, is that the vaccinated person will develop an immunity to the disease and
2
be thus protected from future infection. Unlike natural immunity from a disease contracted from the
environment, which is typically lifelong, the immunity from vaccination, if it is present at all, is
fleeting, requiring booster shots.
Vaccines are not given as therapeutic medicine to treat a person who is ill with a disease.
Vaccines are given to people who are well. To get vaccinated is to take on a spirit of fear and
reliance on man rather than God.
But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole
need not a physician, but they that are sick.” (Matthew 9:12)
For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and
of a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7).
Christians are religiously bound to care for their bodies as they are the temple of the Holy
Spirit.
Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God
dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God
destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are. (1
Corinthians 3:16-17)
What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost
which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For
ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in
your spirit, which are God’s. (1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
It is the wish of God that we prosper in our physical health. “Beloved, I wish above all things
that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.” 3 John 1:2. Vaccines are
detrimental to health, and thus, it would violate God’s command to be vaccinated.It is an established
scientific fact that vaccines cause allergies and other ailments.
Food Allergies
Vinu Arumugham, in an article written for the Journal of Developing Drugs, reveals that
“Nobel Laureate Charles Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago that injecting a protein into
animals or humans causes immune system sensitization to that protein.”18 What does that mean for
the person receiving the vaccine? Arumugham explains that “[s]ubsequent exposure to the protein
can result in allergic reactions or anaphylaxis.”19 Thus, food proteins injected into a person through
a vaccine can have the effect of causing a subsequent allergic reaction by that person who
subsequently eats food that contains the food proteins in the vaccine.
That means that vaccines can cause food allergies. Arumugham reveals that this scientific
3
fact of vaccine-induced allergies “has since been demonstrated over and over again in humans and
animal models.”20 Vaccines contain food proteins derived from chicken eggs, casein, gelatin, soy,
agar, etc. Those ingredients sound innocent enough. And if they were eaten they would not be
harmful and, indeed, would be nutritious. But when those same ingredients are injected into a human
body, in a significant number of cases, a person develops an allergic reaction or even anaphylaxis
to that food protein.
The allergic reaction is caused because accompanying the food protein is an adjuvant whose
purpose is to stimulate the body’s immune response to the antigen. The problem is that the stimulated
immune response is not limited to the antigen. The body also develops an immune response to the
food proteins in the vaccine. The stimulated immune response to the food protein causes an allergic
reaction to the food when consumed.
For example, casein is a phosphoprotein derived from milk. Trace amounts of casein are
often found in vaccines. Indeed, the DTaP children’s vaccine is cultured using bovine casein as a
medium. There has been an explosion of people who have developed allergies to milk. According
to the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, “cow’s milk is the most common
food allergy in children under the age of 5.”21
It is probable that milk allergies in young children are
a direct result of the stimulated immune response to the bovine casein in the DTaP vaccine.
Aluminum Adjuvant
Vaccines contain adjuvants that are designed to stimulate the immune response to the antigen
in the vaccine. A common adjuvant is aluminum.22
Indeed, the CDC lists aluminum, aluminum
hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate, or aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate as
ingredients in 27 vaccines.23 Aluminum is a dangerous neurotoxin and carcinogen. Research has
established that “[t]he adverse neurologic, hematopoietic, skeletal, respiratory, immunologic, and
other effects associated with excessive aluminum (Al) exposures are well known.”24
Research has proven that the neurological effects of aluminum include “impairment on
neurobehavioral tests for psychomotor and cognitive performance and an increased incidence of
subjective neurologicalsymptoms.”25
Indeed, “studies clearlyidentifythe nervous system as the most
sensitive target of aluminum toxicity.”
26
In studies involving “intramuscular administration of
aluminum hydroxide or aluminum phosphate vaccine adjuvants in rabbits, increased levels of
aluminum were found in the kidney, spleen, liver, heart, lymph nodes, and brain (in decreasing order
of aluminum concentration).”27
Mercury
On or about 1999, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that mercury
in vaccines, in the form of thimerosal, exceeded FDA guidelines for mercury exposure. Mercury is
a known neurotoxin. The mercury safety standards were determined by measuring methylmercury.
But the mercury in thimerosal metabolizes in the body as ethylmercury. The FDA had no safety
4
guidelines for ethylmercury. The FDA did not know what to do, so they correctly required vaccine
companies to reduce or eliminate the use of thimerosal in vaccines. The CDC identifies thimerosal
as a preservative. It is still being used in vaccines. While thimerosal has been removed from
childhood vaccines, according to the CDC, it remains an ingredient in influenza, tetanus, and
Diptheria vaccines.28
Polyethylene Glycol
Both theModerna and thePfizer/BionTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contain lipids,which
have polyethylene glycol as part of the lipid ingredients.29 PEG has been proven to cause
hypersensitivity reactions.30 A hypersensitivity reaction is an exaggerated or inappropriate immune
response that can include anaphylaxis.31
“The Anaphylaxis is a medical emergency because it can
lead to an acute, life-threatening respiratory failure.”32
Indeed, as of March 5, 2021, “at least 1,689
recipients of the Pfizer and Moderna injections have reported anaphylactic or serious allergic
reactions.”33 The anaphylaxis was predictable. Prior research documented the detrimental effects of
PEG on drug delivery. On September 25, 2020, Robert Kennedy,Jr., warned the FDA and NIH about
the dangers of PEG in the (at that time) proposed mRNA vaccines.34 No action was taken by the
FDA, NIH, Moderna, or Pfizer to mitigate the risk inherent in the mRNA vaccine PEG excipients.
Polysorbate 80
Polysorbate 80 is an excipient contained in the Johnson & Johnson (aka Janssen) COVID-19
vaccine.35
It is also an ingredient in the following vaccines: DtaP-IPV, Hep B influenza
Meningaogoccal, Pneumococcal, Rotavirus, Tdap, Shingles.
36 Polysorbate 80 has been proven to
cause hypersensitivity reactions.37 A hypersensitivity reaction is a type of exaggerated or
inappropriate immune response that can include anaphylaxis.
38
“The Anaphylaxis is a medical
emergency because it can lead to an acute, life-threatening respiratory failure.”39
Indeed, CNBC
reported that “[t]wo trial participantssuffered severe allergic reactions shortly after getting Johnson
& Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine.”40
Aborted Fetal Tissue Used in Making Vaccines
Vaccines often contain aborted fetal tissue, and those that do not contain aborted fetal tissue
are often developed using aborted fetal tissues. For example, Dr. Brianne Barker, associate professor
of biologyat Drew University, explains that “in order to make the [Johnson and Johnson COVID-19]
vaccine, the scientists give PerC6 [fetal] cells DNA so that they can make the parts of the virus and
build that molecular machine—basically the PerC6 [fetal] cells are the factories that make the
vaccine for us.”41 The PERC6 fetal cells are allegedly later filtered out ofthe J&JCOVID-19 vaccine
before it is put into vials for injection.42 Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna used the HEK293 fetal cell
lines in their testing stages for their COVID-19 vaccines.43
The HEK293 fetal line derived from an elective abortion in the 1970s is routinely used to
produce proteins and cultivate viruses.44
HEK is an acronym for human embryonic kidney cells.
5
The WI-38 fetal line was derived from fetal tissues harvested from an elective abortion in the
1960s to generate attenuated viruses.45
The MRC-5 fetal line was derived from fetal lung tissues harvested from an elective abortion
in 1966. The abortion records indicate that it was taken from a 14-week male fetus removed for
psychiatric reasons from a 27-year-old woman with a genetically normal family history. MRC-5 is
used to generate attenuated viruses.46
The origin of PER.C6 fetal line is documented through direct testimony before the Food and
Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee from Dr.
Alex Van Der Eb, who stated: “So I isolated retina [cells] from a fetus, from a healthy fetus as far
as could be seen, of 18 weeks old. There was nothing special in the family history, or the pregnancy
was completely normal up to 18 weeks, and it turned out to be a socially indicated abortus, abortus
provocatus, and that was simply because the woman wanted to get rid of the fetus.”47 The PER.C6
fetal line is currently used in the research and development of vaccines.
Abortion is the sin of unjustifiable homicide. God states that we are living souls from the
moment of conception in the womb.
For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my
mother’s womb. I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully
made: marvellous are thyworks; and that my soul knoweth right well.
(Psalms 139:13-14)
Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD
hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath
he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1)
Indeed, we are ordained to be living souls by God before our conception in our mothers’
wombs. God forms us in the womb.
Before Iformed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest
forth out of the womb Isanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet
unto the nations. (Jeremiah 1:5)
God is the creator of all things, including the creator of each man in his mother’s womb.
As thou knowest not what is the way of the spirit, nor how the bones
do grow in the womb of her that is with child: even so thou knowest
not the works of God who maketh all. (Ecclesiastes 11:5)
God of the Lord of all, both born and unborn.
6
I was cast upon thee from the womb: thou art my God from my
mother’s belly. (Psalms 22:10)
Fetusesin the womb are sentient. We see that in Luke when, Elizabeth was greeted by Mary,
who was pregnant with Jesus. John the Babtist, who was unborn and in Elizabeth’s womb jumped
for joy upon hearing the Mary’s greeting.
And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of
Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the
Holy Ghost: (Luke 1:41)
God hates the shedding of innocent blood.
These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination
unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed
innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that
be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and
he that soweth discord among brethren. (Proverbs 6:16-19)
The Holy Bible states that God elected Jacob as the heir to the promise. God elected Jacob
before he was born.
That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the
children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the
seed. For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and
Sara shall have a son. And not only this; but when Rebecca also had
conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the children being
not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose
of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him
that calleth;) It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger.
As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. (Romans
9:8-13)
Notice also what God states about Jacob and Esau. God elected Jacob before they were born
and before either he or Esau had done any good or evil. That means that children who are aborted
have not done any evil. There is no justification for their death; they are innocent. The killers are
culpable, and those who encourage and abet them in their deadly scheme are accomplicesin that sin.
Unless they repent and turn in faith to Jesus Christ, they will be punished by God accordingly. See
Matthew 25:31-46; Romans 2:3-9; 2 Corinthians 5:10; Revelation 20:11-15.
Abortion is homicide. God has commanded that we shall not kill one another. “Thou shalt
not kill.” (Exodus 20:13)
7
Vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe
The dangers of vaccines are inherent in the practice and cannot be avoided. Vaccines have
been acknowledged by the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress to be unavoidably unsafe.
Congress passed the National Vaccine Injury Act (NVIA) of 1986, granting pharmaceutical
companiesimmunity for injuries caused bythe vaccines theymanufactured. As explained bythe U.S.
Supreme Court in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth48
, the reason for that protection is that Congress deemed
vaccinesto be unavoidably unsafe;49
thus no manufacturer wouldmake a vaccine if theyhad to suffer
the liability for injuries they would unavoidably cause.50
Mary S. Holland explains the issue: “The success of the national vaccine program has come
at a cost. Some children are permanently disabled or die from their vaccine exposures. … Between
1980 and 1986, people who claimed vaccine injury brought over three billion dollars of damages
claims to U.S. civil courts against vaccine manufacturers.”51
In response to the litigation that held them accountable for the injuries caused by their
vaccines, the vaccine manufacturers lobbied Congress, and in 1986 they were able to get the NVIA
law passed. That law protected them from civil liability for injuries caused by vaccines that they
manufactured.
The underlying legal reasoning of Congress for the 1986 NVIA law was a concept borrowed
from the Restatement of Torts law that vaccines were
“unavoidablyunsafe.” Holland explains that “[t]heRestatement
describes all vaccines as ‘unavoidably unsafe’ products and
implicitly recommended that manufacturers not be liable for
injuries if doctors administered them properly.”52
In his 1722 pamphlet, “A Sermon Against the
Dangerous and Sinful Practice of Inoculation,”EdmundMassey
explains that vaccination is a sin. Notice that Massey’s sermon
wasin 1722. That was 27 years before Edward Jenner was born.
That is proof that the practice of administering disease into the
blood of healthy persons did not start with Edward Jenner. The
word vaccine had not yet been coined in the medical
communitywhen Massey gave his 1722 sermon. Massey called
the practice of contaminating the blood of healthy people with
disease inoculation. It was not until 1798 that Jenner published
his fraudulent report and coined the term variolae vaccinae
from which we get the word, vaccine. Massey’ssermon reveals
that inoculation (i.e., vaccination) is a heathen religious practice
masquerading as a medical procedure. Massey explainsthat the
Holy Bible reveals that all diseases are under the sovereign
control of God. Disease is brought upon men for one of two
8
reasons: 1) to try our faith, and 2) to punish our sin. Indeed, God explains his sovereignty over all
good and evil. “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do
all these things.” (Isaiah 45:7) God uses disease and hardship to correct his elect.
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not
thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth
up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole.” (Job 5:17-18)
TheBible revealsthat God sometimes delegates his power to bring disease in rare occasions.
For example, in Job, God permitted Satan to strike Job with a noisome disease that caused boils from
head to toe. Job 2:4-7. Notice how God gave Satan permission to strike Job with disease.
And Satan answered the LORD, and said, Skin for skin, yea, all that
a man hath will he give for his life. But put forth thine hand now, and
touch his bone and his flesh, and he will curse thee to thy face. And
the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his
life. So went Satan forth from the presence of the LORD, and smote
Job with sore boils from the sole of his foot unto his crown. (Job 2:4-
7)
Edmund Massey opines that Job’s disease was brought about by some form of infusion of
a toxin similar to the practice of vaccination.
The silence of scripture hath given interpreters occasion of guessing
at the distemper, which the Devil here inflicted upon Job. But among
them all, it appears not certainly what it was. I will therefore desire to
give an opinion, equally Ithink true, with any that hath yet been taken
notice of. It is this, That the Devil by some venomous Infusion into
the Body of Job, might raise his blood to such a ferment, as threw out
a confluence of inflammatory pustules all over him, from head to
Foot. That is, his distemper might be what is now incident to most
men, and perhaps conveyed to him by some such way as that of
inoculation.53
Massey explains the motive of Satan in striking Job with the terrible disease.
The tempter’s aim was still the same as before; to make his patient let
go his Integrity, throw off his dependance upon Almighty God, and
renounce that allegiance which is justly due to him, as creator and
governor of the world.54
The attack on Job was unusual because God delegated his power over disease to Satan. That
disease was not to punish Job for sin but to test (and prove) Job’s faithfulness to God. Massey
9
explains:
Our Text indeed ascribes Job’s distemper to the power of the Devil;
but the foregoing verse shows that power to have been delegated to
him, and limited by Almighty God, who alone being omnipotent, the
powersthat be, whether natural or Political, must all be derived from
him [God]. ‘Tis true, he has communicated several parts of his
sovereignty to the sons of men, but still the exercise of it will
ultimately be resolved into his permission. And it is as true, that there
are several branches of authority, which he [God] has reserved to
himself, in displaying of which, he acts upon prerogative, and without
human intervention. I choose to instance in the infliction of diseases,
which I will attempt to prove are utterly unlawful to be inflicted, by
any who profess themselves Christians.55
The usual course is that disease is brought on directly from God. Paul offers us another
example where God sent “the messenger of Satan to buffet” him by striking Paul with thorn of pain
of some kind in his side. God did this to keep Paul humble. Paul explained that it was part of God’s
plan to make him weak in the flesh so that he would be strong in the spirit.
And lest Ishould be exalted above measure through the abundance of
the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the
messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above
measure. For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart
from me. And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my
strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I
rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon
me. Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in
necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ’s sake: for when
I am weak, then am I strong. (2 Corinthians 12:7-10)
Another reason for God to bring disease is to punish a person for his sin. The malady is
thought to flow from the actions of the natural laws set in place by God.
For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh
damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body. For this cause
many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. (1
Corinthians 11:29-30)
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman,
burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that
which is unseemly, and receiving in themselvesthat recompence of
their error which was meet. (Romans 1:27)
10
Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth,
that shall he also reap. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the
flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the
Spirit reap life everlasting. Galatians 6:7-8
All elect Christians are the spiritual seed of Jesus Christ. Galatians 3:16, 29. Nonetheless,
if we transgress his commandments, he will correct us. One of the means of correction is through
disease. But his correction of us does not affect the eternal promise of salvation.
Also I will make him my firstborn, higher than the kings of the earth.
My mercy will I keep for him for evermore, and my covenant shall
stand fast with him. His seed also will I make to endure for ever,
and his throne as the days of heaven. If his children forsake my
law, and walk not in my judgments; If they break my statutes,
and keep not my commandments; Then will I visit their
transgression with the rod, and their iniquity with stripes.
Nevertheless my lovingkindness will I not utterly take from him, nor
suffer my faithfulness to fail. My covenant will I not break, nor alter
the thing that is gone out of my lips. (Psalms 89:27-34)
But if we make the Lord our refuge and fortress, he will deliver us from disease. We are not
to fear the pestilence by night.
I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in
him will I trust. Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the
fowler, and from the noisome pestilence. He shall cover thee with
hisfeathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy
shield and buckler. Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night;
nor for the arrow that flieth by day; Nor for the pestilence that
walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.
(Psalms 91:2-6)
If we keep his commandments and take refuge in the Lord, no evil plague of disease will
come near us.
Because thou hast made the LORD, which is my refuge, even the
most High, thy habitation; There shall no evil befall thee, neither
shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling. For he shall give his
angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways. (Psalms 91:9-
11)
To take a vaccine is to eschew the promises of God and put trust in man. Vaccination
implicitly encourages sin by promising that there will be no consequential disease. People are
11
beguiled by the devil’s promise of immunity from future diseases. But the disease comes anyway
because Vaccines come with a promise that cannot be delivered. Often the disease comes from the
vaccine itself. Vaccination is a sin. Those suffering from vaccine-induced disease should repent,
humble themselves before God, and call on his mercy.
Massey calls vaccination a diabolical practice that promotes vice and immorality by giving
people the false hope of sin without consequences by assuring them that through injection with an
antigen, they will be protected from future illness. Rather than live a clean and moral life, they can
now throw caution to the wind and live it up since they are immune from the consequences of their
sin.
Remembering then our text, Ishall not scruple to call that a diabolical
operation, which usurps an authority founded neither in the laws of
nature or religion, which tends in this case to anticipate and banish
providence out of the world, and promotes the increase of vice and
immorality.
56
With that in mind, it is clear that we should not purposely cause disease through vaccination.
Disease is an evil that is under the control of God, and for man to usurp that power is a sin. It is a
sin to do what is solely in the province of God. It is a sin to cause disease. Disease brings death, and
making someone ill that could lead to his death is a violation of the commandment of God. “Thou
shalt not kill.” Exodus 20:13.
Sincere Christian beliefs are founded on the Holy Bible. The Bible says:”For the life of the
flesh is in the blood…” Leviticus 17:11, and “… the life of all flesh; the blood of it is for the life
thereof.” Leviticus 17:14. Therefore, in order to preserve the life of one’s flesh, one must keep one’s
blood unpolluted from foreign proteins, antigens, adjuvants, and other pollutants typically found in
vaccines.
Eustace Mullins reveals in his book, Murder by Injection, that Dr. W. B. Clarke wrote that
“Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be
introduced. I have had to deal with a least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of
cancer in an unvaccinated person.”57
In a speech elaborating on Dr. Clarke’s statement Mullins
stated:
Other doctors have said the same thing, that vaccination is really a
time bomb within the human system that can go off five years, ten
years, 40 years after you have the vaccinatin you could have the time
bomb go off, you could have a stroke, a heart attack because it’s
always there in your system, you never get rid of it. And, apparently,
it’s always an alien force in your physique.58
The process of death begins with poisoning through vaccination. For example, the explosion
12
in deadly cancers is primarily caused by vaccination. All one needs to hear is that he has been
diagnosed with cancer to understand that death is near. With some cancers, the death rate is 90%.59
The barbarous practices of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation offer little succor other than the
hope of delaying the fast-approaching date of death. Certainly, there are persons who have “beat
cancer,” but there is a significant plurality who succumb to the disease. Dr. Dennis Turnbull, who
had studied cancer for 30 years declared: “I have no hesitation in stating that in my judgement the
most frequent disposing condition for cancerous development is infused into the blood by
vaccination and re-vaccination.”
60 Dr. Forbes Laurie, late Medical Director of the Metropolitan
Cancer Hospital (London), said: “I am thoroughly convinced that the increase of cancer is due to
vaccination.”61 Dr. Robert Bell, the famous cancer specialist of the British Cancer Hospital, stated:
“The chief, if not the sole cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination.”62
Dr. Herbert Snow, Surgeon of the London Cancer Hospital, had this to say: “I am convinced
thatsome 80 per cent of these cancer deaths are caused by the inoculations or vaccinations they have
undergone. These are well-known to cause grave and permanent disease of the heart also.”63
Regarding the heart, in the book, Murder by Injection, Eustace Mullins revealsthat Dr. Snow stated:
“In recent years many men and women in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly, often after
attending a feast or a banquet. I am convinced that some eighty per cent of these deaths are caused
by the inoculation or vaccination they have undergone. They are well known to cause grave and
permanent disease to the heart.”64
If some in the medical community know vaccinations cause grave and permanent disease to
the heart, why does the public not rise up against vaccination? Dr. Snow explained that the public
is kept ignorant of the dangers because “[t]he coroner always hushes it up as ‘natural causes.'”
65 The
medical community has a cult of secrecy regarding the causal link between vaccination and deadly
diseases.
It seems that Dr. Snow’s 80% vaccine causal rate for heart disease and cancer might be an
understatement. A recent study points the needle of causation closer to 100%. That study compared
the health of a group of 1,482 unvaccinated persons to the national statistics on the health of
vaccinated persons.66 The study revealed that 48% of the vaccinated adults had some form of heart
disease, compared to zero percent (0%) of the unvaccinated adults.67 Six percent (6%) of the
vaccinated adults had cancer compared to zero percent (0%) of the unvaccinated adults.68 That study
is not widely publicized, and most do not know about it. The secrecy cult in the medical
establishment will ensure that it stays that way. In his book, Cancer and Vaccination, Esculapius
says:
No candid and scientific inquirer who has read the works of such
authorities as Doctors Creighton, Crookshank and Scott Tebb, can be
surprised that an alarming increase in cancer is now evident. Those
who adopt the brutal practice of calf-lymph vaccination are but too
surely sowing the wind which they must inevitably reap as the
whirlwind, a whirlwind of corruption, disease and national
13
deterioration. Where the so-called, human lymph is employed,
syphilis, leprosy and tuberculosis follow in its train; and wherever
calf-lymph is used, tuberculosis and cancer spread like a
conflagration.69
Sir Thomas Paget (M.D.), tells us that “the progress of vaccine infection in the blood shows
us that a permanent morbid condition is established; in the tissues themselves, it is also established
by thisspecific poison.”70 Dr. Benchetrit states that serums and vaccines “are principally responsible
forthe increase of those two really dangerous diseases, cancer and heart disease.”71 Dr. F. P. Millard,
prominent Osteopath of Toronto and President of the National League for Prevention of Spinal
Curvature says: “Abolish vaccination, and you will cut the cancer death-rate in half.”72
Cancer is just one of the many diseases spread by vaccination. Eleanor McBean states that
“[w]herever an honest survey is made after a vaccination campaign it is noticed that there is always
a marked increase in disease.”73 Thomas Morgan, in his Medical Delusions reports a survey that was
made of the city of Youngstown, Ohio, after a general vaccination order of school children. “It was
found that nearly all the cases of scarlet fever, measles and diphtheria had been recently vaccinated.
What is true of this city is true everywhere, and any close observer can satisfy himself in this
direction.”74
In or about 1955, Eleanor McBean took up Morgan’s challenge and checked the Los
Angeles Health Index for 1954. She found that the total number of cases of 48 diseases recorded in
the index, including but not limited to chickenpox, scarletfever, measles, mumps, and syphilis, more
than doubled after the annual June 1954 vaccine campaign.75 Dr. Peebles, (world renowned
researcher and authority on vaccination) stated in his book on Compulsory Vaccination:
We shall never stamp out smallpox, cancer, consumption, or leprosy,
so long as we continue to STAMP THEM IN through the idiotic and
vicious practice of vaccination. The Germans endeavored to stamp
out syphilis by stamping it in with syphilized vaccine. They have
abandoned that practice now and in time they will abandon
vaccination altogether.76
(emphasis in original)
A 2018 human research study of the efficacy and safety of influenza vaccines “did not
observe that influenza vaccination significantly reduced overall hazard of influenza.”77
In addition,
the studyfound that the hazard of acute respiratoryillness (ARI) caused bynon-influenza respiratory
pathogens was higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals.78
A 2013 animal research study found that the influenza vaccine caused vaccine-associated
enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD), wherein the animals ended up with enhanced influenza
(pH1N1) infection.79
“Vaccinating pigs with whole inactivated H1N2 (human-like) virus vaccine
(WIV-H1N2) resulted in enhanced pneumonia and disease after pH1N1 infection.”80
Causing disease in someone violates the great commandment that “as ye would that men
should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.” Luke 6:31. Massey explains:
14
The HolyScriptures give usfrequent instances of God’s giving power
unto men to heal diseases; and by his blessing a power is still
continued. But that one was ever granted to inflict diseases, will I
think hardly appear; unless in the case of Moses with the Egyptians,
and Elisha with his servant Gehazi. But both these cases were
miraculous, and of God’s own immediate appointment, to vindicate
the honour of his servants the prophets, and for the punishment of
sacrilege and idolatry, and cannot be drawn into precedent by any not
invested with the same character and authority. Men may, and have
invented wracks and tortures for each other, but no man, let his
Crimes be what they will, was ever yet condemned to an immediate
sickness, or sentenced to lie languish ing in a fever, for want of a
sufficient authority, which no body but a present set of adventurous
practitioners have of late pretended to assume.81
It is a sin for man to kill another man. Matthew 19:18. But it is not a sin for God to kill a
man. In like manner, it is a sin for a man to bring about disease in another through vaccination, but
it is not sin for God to bring about disease in another.
See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and
I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can
deliver out of my hand. Deuteronomy 32:39.
Indeed, God sent disease among the Egyptians and killed the firstborn of each Egyptian
household.
He [God] made a way to his anger; he spared not their soul from
death, but gave their life over to the pestilence; And smote all the
firstborn in Egypt; the chief of their strength in the tabernacles of
Ham. (Psalms 78:50-51)
Massey explains that disease is within the sovereign authority of God. It is not for man to
usurp that authority and inject antigens to cause disease through vaccination in the hope that later
the person will develop an immunity to the pathogen.
It will easily be granted, therefore, that such a procedure, for want of
a competent authority, is unlawful. That if diseases, as
beforementioned, are sent unto us for the trial of our faith, or the
punishment of our sins; He alone to whom our faith must approve
itself, and our sins are manifest, has properly the power of inflicting
them.82
God is sovereign. “All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made
15
that was made.” John 1:3 “And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.” (Colossians
1:17) Indeed, God knows the end from the beginning.
According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the
world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ
to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will. (Ephesians
1:4-5)
Indeed, God can use evil for good ends. But don’t get it twisted. What is permissible for God
is not permissible for man. God is omnipotent; he knows the end from the beginning. Man is not
omnipotent; man has no way of being sure that a good end will result from his evil means. While
with God, good ends justify evil means, with man, good ends can never justify evil means. Man
cannot commit the evil sin of injecting a vaccine containing harmful antigens, toxic adjuvants, and
noxious contaminants to infect a person with a disease to accomplish the supposed good end of
creating a theoretical future immunity from that disease. Indeed, the death and disease from vaccines
testify to the error of man working to have the ends justify the means.
God’s crucifixion of Jesus Christ illustrates how, with God, the ends justify the means. God
used evil means for good ends. The crucifixion of Jesus Christ was a torturous death, but God used
that evil for good; it is the means through which Jesus Christ atoned for the sins of his elect. And it
was all orchestrated by God.
Judas betrayed Jesus as prophesied by God hundreds of years earlier. Jesus stated, while
praying to God the Father: “While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that
thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture
might be fulfilled.” (John 17:12 )
The betrayal of Jesus by Judas was planned by God. In Jeremiah we read a prophecy written
approximately 600 years before the betrayal of Jesus by Judas: “Yea, mine own familiar friend, in
whom I trusted, which did eat of my bread, hath lifted up his heel against me.” (Psalms 41:9 AV)
Jesus, referring to the prophecy in Jeremiah, told the apostles: “Ispeak not of you all: I know whom
I have chosen: but that the scripture may be fulfilled, He that eateth bread with me hath lifted up his
heel against me.” (John 13:18)
Jesus knew Judas would betray him: “For he knew who should betray him; therefore said he,
Ye are not all clean.” (John 13:11) Judas had no more a free will in the matter than a pencil has a
free will to write. Judas, like the pencil, was an instrument completely under God’s control.
God did not leave our salvation to the chance that Judas might not betray Jesus. God is love.
1 John 4:8. It would be the very antithesis of love to leave our salvation to chance. God is not a
gambler.
16
Judas was preordained by God to betray Jesus. Judas had no choice in the matter. God
predicted what Judas would do hundreds of years before he did it and then predicted it to his apostles
moments before it happened. Jesus then personally gave Judas orders to hurry up and betray him.
Judas could not resist the will of God.
Jesus answered, He it is, to whom I shall give a sop, when I have
dipped it. And when he had dipped the sop, he gave it to Judas
Iscariot, the son of Simon. And after the sop Satan entered into him.
Then said Jesus unto him, That thou doest, do quickly. (John 13:26-
27)
Not only did Judas not have a free will to choose whether to betray Jesus, but every single
act of Herod, Pontius Pilate, the Jews, and the Romans was preordained and orchestrated by the
sovereign God of Heaven. “For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed,
both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together,
For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done.” (Acts 4:27-28)
In fact, God orders the steps of all men and controls their very tongue. “The preparations of the heart
in man, and the answer of the tongue are from the Lord.” Prov. 16:1.
While God may do evil so that good may come of it, man my not do that same thing. Man
cannot do evil (cause disease) in order that some good may come of it. That is the theory of
vaccination. The ends cannot justify the means. We are forbidden to do evil in order to obtain some
good end. Bad means corrupt the intended good. “And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported,
and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.”
(Romans 3:8) Indeed, “whatsoever is not of faith is sin.” (Romans 14:23)
A person is injected with a pathogen on the theory that the recipient’s body will become
immune to the disease. Even if that theory were correct, it would be a sin to inject a person with an
antigen to cause an immune response. That is to “do evil that good may come.” That is a sin. See
Romans 14:23. But the good that is expected is a phantom; the medical theory of vaccination is
fallacious. Job explains: “But ye are forgers of lies, ye are all physicians of no value.” (Job 13:4)
The gospel message is that those who have saving faith and are thus justified will live by that
faith. Their faith is a living faith, not a dead faith. “For therein is the righteousness of God revealed
from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.” Romans 1:17. See also Galatians
3:11. Indeed, God has a warning for those who purport to believe but who do not live by faith. “Now
the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.”
(Hebrews 10:38) “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of
heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.” (Matthew 7:21) Faith brings
obedience. It is special obedience wrought by God through faith that God imparts in the believer.
“But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment
of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith.” (Romans 16:26) We
are called on to have nothing to do with evil. We are to avoid even the appearance of evil. We are
17
to “abstain from all appearance of evil.” 1 Thessalonians 5:22. Indeed, we are to reprove evil. “And
have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.” (Ephesians 5:11)
Vaccination is an unfruitful work of darkness forged by lies. Christians are duty-bound to reprove
the evil practice.
The Mythical Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines
Vaccines are largely ineffective and unsafe. Indeed, it is an established medical fact that the
COVID-19 vaccines not only do not prevent illness, they cause illness. Please be mindful that the
COVID-19 vaccines were authorized because they purportedly prevented infection and the
spread of the disease. Dr. Hilary Marston of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Disease at the NIH, gave a presentation during an October 22, 2020 meeting of the Vaccines and
Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.83 That meeting was before the issuance of the
EUAsfor the COVID-19 vaccines. During her presentation, she explained that the primary endpoint
for all COVID-19 vaccine studies was to prevent COVID-19. Below is one of her slides where it
states: “Primary Endpoint: Prevention ofsymptomaticCOVID-19disease (PCRconfirmed).”84
Dr. PeterMcCullough, M.D., gave an informative presentation at the 2022 United Healthcare
Summit.85
Dr. McCullough is an American cardiologist. He was vice chief of internal medicine at
Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University. He is editor-in-chief
ofthe journals Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiorenal Medicine. He is one of the most
highly respected and published cardiologists in the U.S.
He was once one of the most published and cited authors in the medical community. Since
he has come out explaining the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines, Baylor and Texas A&M have
cut ties with him. He has had his research revealing the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines suddenly
unpublished and deleted.
During his presentation, Dr. MCullough mentioned the sweeping research by the World
Council For Health (WCH). I decided to check his claims about the WCH research findings. I
discovered that he was correct. My research took me beyond the WCH findings. It includes some
surprising facts and evidence, which will be shocking to some, about the COVID-19 vaccines.
The World Council For Health (WCH) extensively studied the world databases on the
COVID-19 vaccine injuries. The WCH for health studied the WHO VigiAccess, CDC VAERS,
EudraVigilance, and UK Yellow Card Scheme to determine whether the COVID-19 vaccines are
safe.86 On June 11, 2022, the WCH announced its results. The WCH found that the databases
revealed more than 40,000 deaths linked to the COVID-19 vaccines and called for an immediate
recall of those vaccines.87
Those reported deaths are just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. Dr. Katrina Lindley explains
the deficiency in the reports:
18
[S]uch systems of passive surveillance result in significantly fewer
ADR [adverse drug reaction] reports than active surveillance
reporting. As a result, the actual number of adverse events that
occurred in temporal relation to Covid-19 injections is likely to be
much higher than revealed by the available official data.88
The under-reporting in the databases is quite significant. Indeed, it is exponential. For
example, because the VAERS database relies on passive reporting, it suffers from a systemic flaw
known to HHS. That flaw is that the VAERS database under-reports the vaccine adverse events by
a factor of 100. A Harvard study of the VAERS database that HHS commissioned revealed that
“fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”89 That statistical finding in the Harvard
study has been confirmed to be accurate in a subsequent scientific study.
90
The adverse events listed in VAERS have not been clinically proven to have been caused by
the listed vaccine. But we can reasonably infer that those who died within 48 hours of the onset of
illness after the vaccination died from the vaccine. Megan Redshaw determined that 41% of those
reported in VAERS as having died from a COVID-19 vaccine did so after becoming ill within 48
hours of the injection.91 We will consider that temporal proximity as establishing a reasonable belief
that the COVID-19 vaccines were the cause of the deaths.
VAERS reported that of July 15, 2022, there were 29,635 deaths attributed to COVID-19.
41% of 29,635 is 12,150. Thus, one can reasonably conclude there is probable cause to believe that
12,150 persons died from the COVID-19 vaccine. Understanding that the VAERS system only
reports 1% of the actual deaths, we find that the deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines are 1,215,000
people as of July 15, 2022.
Similar numbers were arrived at by other researchers. VAERS is a database that reports
adverse events associated with vaccines. The appearance of an adverse event in the database does
not prove that the vaccine caused the adverse event.Because the VAERS database reports correlation
and does not prove causation, we are left to extrapolate causation from the numbers reported in the
VAERS database. Researchers led by Dr. Scott McLachlan, Ph.D., determined that the vaccine
caused 86% of deaths reported in VAERS.92 Dr. Jessica Rose, Ph.D., and her team of researchers
studied the U.S. VAERS database and determined that VAERS underreported adverse events,
including deaths, from the COVID-19 vaccines by a factor of 41. That means the actual adverse
events, including deaths, associated with the COVID-19 vaccines are 41 times greater than reported
in the VAERS system.93
Dr. Rose is a Canadian researcher with a Bachelor Degree in Applied Mathematics and a
Master’s degree in Immunology from Memorial Universityof Newfoundland. She also holds a Ph.D.
inComputational Biologyfrom Bar Ilan Universityand two Post Doctoral degrees: one in Molecular
Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and one in Biochemistry from the Technion
Institute of Technology.
19
Assuming the VAERS system underreports adverse events by 41-fold, and the COVID-19
vaccine caused 86% of the deaths reported in VAERS, we can determine the actual number of deaths
caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.94 As of September 23, 2022, the VAERS database reported that
31,214 persons died after being vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine. Although the U.S.
Government keeps the VAERS database, it also includes deaths from COVID-19 vaccinations in
other countries. Approximately 50% of the deathsreported in VAERS are from other countries. That
means approximately 15,000 persons died in the U.S. alone from COVID-19 vaccines.
We will start with the 15,000 U.S. figure. Multiplying that figure by 41 we arrive at 615,000.
But only 86% of that number can be said to have died from the vaccine. Multiplying 615,000 by .86,
we arrive at a final figure of 528,900 as the number of persons who died from the COVID-19
vaccines in the U.S. as of September 23, 2022. If we apply that formula to the total of U.S. and
overseas reported deaths in VAERS, we arrive at a figure of 1.1 million deaths caused by the
COVID-19 vaccines as of September 23, 2022.
President Biden’s claim that “[t]he vaccines are safe, highly effective,”95
is provably false.
TheCDC and the vaccine manufacturers are on record admitting that the COVID-19 vaccines do not
prevent the spread of COVID-19. Indeed, before the EUA authorization by the FDA of the
Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine, the Daily Mail reported that on or before December 4, 2020, “Pfizer CEO
[Albert Bourla] admits he is ‘not certain’ their COVID-19 shot will prevent vaccinated people from
spreading the virus.”96
Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks is on record saying that the Moderna vaccine can
prevent someone from getting sick from COVID-19 but that there is no evidence that it can prevent
someone receiving the vaccine from carrying the virus and infecting others. Before the FDA issuance
of the EUA for the Moderna vaccine, on or before November 23, 2020, Zaks stated: “our results
show that this vaccine can prevent you from being sick, it can prevent you from being severely sick.
They do not show that it prevents you from potentially carrying this virus transiently and infecting
others.”97
There are many anecdotal examples of fully vaccinated persons being subsequently infected
with COVID-19. For example, it was reported by COVID Legal USA on March 12, 2021, that there
was a COVID-19 infection outbreak at the Cottonwoods Care Centre retirement facility in Kelowna,
British Columbia, even though 82% of the residents were fully vaccinated. Eight out of the twelve
COVID-19 confirmed cases were fully vaccinated persons.98 That means that 66% of confirmed
COVID-19 cases were from those who were fully vaccinated.
Because it became clear early on that the COVID-19 vaccines did not prevent the spread of
COVID-19, the CDC found it necessary to issue a press release on March 8, 2021, saying that fully
vaccinated Americans must “continue to take these COVID-19 precautions when in public.”99 That
included wearing masks, staying six feet apart from other people, and avoiding large crowds.
Indeed, the COVID-19 infection rate for vaccinated persons has gotten so out of hand that
20
on July 27, 2021, the CDC had to change its guidance because of the alleged spreading of COVID-19
by vaccinated persons. NBC News reported:
TheCentersfor Disease Control and Prevention issued new guidance
on Tuesday recommending indoor mask use in areas with high
transmission rates after new data suggested fully vaccinated
individuals are not just contracting Covid-19 but could
potentially infect others.
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said recent studies had shown that
those vaccinated individuals who do become infected with Covid
have just as much viral load as the unvaccinated, making it
possible for them to spread the virus to others. Based on that
finding, Walensky said the CDCis also recommending that all school
children wear masks in the fall.100
(emphasis added)
Emily Kopp, writing for Roll Call, reported that a confidential congressional briefing
revealed that “[t]here are 35,000 symptomatic breakthrough cases each weeks.” Kopp concluded that
vaccinated persons can be “superspreaders” of COVID-19.
The newly released reportshowing that vaccinated people can still be
superspreaders drove the recent decision by the CDC to once again
recommend masks for vaccinated people indoors where case counts
are high or substantial.101
On August 6, 2021, the CDC published a report that 346 out of out of 469 COVID-19 cases
(74%) in a breakout in Barnsdale County, Massachusetts, were of people who were fully
vaccinated.102
The COVID-19 vaccines are proving to be ineffective in preventing infection.
Dr. Nina Pierpont (MD, Ph.D.), has a BA in biology from Yale University, MA and Ph.D.
in population biology/evolutionary biology/ecology from Princeton University, and MD from Johns
Hopkins University School of Medicine. Dr. Pierpont has been a Clinical Assistant Professor of
Pediatrics at Columbia University’s College of Physicians & Surgeons. She is currently in private
practice in upstate New York, specializing in behavioral medicine. Dr. Pierpont reviewed the
available data, principally from three scientific studies, and concluded that COVID-19 vaccine
mandates have no justification because “current vaccines do not prevent transmission of
SARS-CoV-2.”103
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, in his attempt to sell the public on their COVID-19 vaccine
booster during a news interview, let the cat out of the bag by stating: “We know that two doses of
the vaccine offers very limited protection if any.”104 When Pfizer realized the implications of that
admission, it immediately filed a copyright claim on that interview and took steps to purge it from
the internet. I was able to track down the video of the interview at the Instagram link found in the
21
endnote.105
99% of the University of California football team and staff were fully vaccinated.106
There
are approximately 143 players and staff on that team.107 But on November 13, 2021, it was
announced that the team had to cancel its upcoming football game with USC because 47 players and
staffmembers on the Universityof California football teamhad tested positive for COVID-19. Many
of them were symptomatic for COVID-19, which is why the entire team was tested. That is a 33%
COVID-19 infection rate for a single group of fully vaccinated persons. The COVID-19 vaccines
are not just ineffective; it seems that the vaccines are driving the infection. It is more likely that the
players and coaches are suffering from antibody-dependent enhancement caused by the vaccine.
Indeed, COVID-19 vaccinations are detrimental to the USA’s counter-drug mission. For
example, on December 25, 2021, Carol Rosenberg and Aishvarya Kavi reported for The New York
Timesthat the USS Milwaukee was supposed to deployto intercept drug traffickers in the Caribbean,
but the ship could not do so because of a Covid-19 outbreak onboard the ship.108 The 105-man crew
of the vessel was 100% vaccinated against COVID-19. That is a clear example that the COVID-19
vaccines are ineffective in preventing COVID-19. What was really going on aboard the ship likely
was that the sailors were suffering from antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) caused by the
vaccinesthemselves. The vaccinesweremaking the sailors sick. Oddly, the USS Milwaukee incident
comes on the heels of active-duty troops in the Army and Navy being fired because they refused to
get vaccinated under President Biden’s vaccination mandate forthe armed services. Perfectlyhealthy
soldiers and sailors were relieved of duty for exercising their rights to refuse to take experimental
vaccines that have now been demonstrated to be both unsafe and ineffective. All the while, the
readiness of the armed services is being detrimentally impacted by the growing occurrence of ADE
among the soldiers and sailors caused by the mandated vaccines.
On November 10, 2021, U.S. District Court Judge T. Kent Wetherell, II, issued an opinion
wherein he denied a request from a plaintiff for a preliminary injunction. He ruled against the doctor
requesting a religious exemption. Nonetheless, in the course of rendering his opinion, the judge
ruled:
[T]the evidence I have shows the vaccine is “leaky” and
“nonsterilizing” in that it does not prevent transmission of the
virus, nor does it protect vaccinated persons fromcontracting the
virus. … [T]he evidence before the court from plaintiff’s medical
expertssuggestthat vaccinated persons actually transmit the virus
at a higher rate than unvaccinated. … [T]he vaccines are
unnecessary for persons who have previously had COVID because
natural immunity provides equivalent or greater protection
against severe infection than the vaccines. … [T]he irrefutable
evidence in this case shows that vaccines simply do not accomplish
the purpose of the policy that it’s aimed at achieving; that is, “keeping
everyone safer,” because, again, they do not protect people from
22
contracting the virus, nor do they prevent people from getting the
virus.109
(emphasis added)
So prevalent were the breakthrough cases of COVID-19 that the CDC announced that
beginning on May 1, 2021, it would no longer monitor or report any breakthrough cases that did not
result in hospitialization or death.110 The CDC and its pharmaceutical overlords could not allow
people to use official government statistics to prove that the COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective.
U.S. Senator for Massachusetts, Edward Markey, saw through the CDC’s subterfuge. In an
official letter of inquiry he demanded to know why the CDC would no longer continue to monitor
the breakthrough cases.111 Senator Markey noted the obvious fact that breakhrough cases are a good
measure of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness. He said that 43.4 of the new COVID-19 infections in
Massachusetts were among those who were vaccinated. Notably, Senator Markey asked the CDC:
“Is the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines decreasing in light of theses breakthrough cases?” The
answer is clear. Indeed, the evident affriramative answer to that question is why the CDC decided
to stop reporting breakthrough COVID-19 cases. The CDC’s decision not to report COVID-19
breakthrough cases among the vaccinated population was indicative of a conspiracy between it an
the pharmaceutical companies to coverup of the ineffectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines.
The United Kingdom Office for National Statistics (ONS), has published data on deaths by
vaccination status.112 The ONS data started from the beginning of April 2022 through the end of May
2022. Between April 1, 2022, and May 31, 2022, 4,647 of the 4,935 total deaths from COVID-19
during that period were among the vaccinated population. That means that 94% of the COVID-19
deaths in the UK during April and May 2022 were among those vaccinated against COVID-19.The
statisticsrevealed another shocking detail. It seems that the more shots, the more deadly the vaccines
are. Those who received three COVID-19 shots accounted for 4,215 of the 4,647 total deaths among
the vaccinated population. That means that those that received threeCOVID-19 shots accounted for
90% of the vaccinated COVID-19 deaths during April and May 2022.
The State of Vermont has had a very similar experience to that of England. The Vermont
Daily Chronicle reported that 76% of COVID-19 deaths in the State of Vermont during September
2021 were of persons who had received COVID-19 vaccinations.
113 Yet, the State of Vermont
Department of Public Health claims that “[v]accines are the best tool we have to protect ourselves
against COVID-19, especially from severe illness, hospitalization and death.”114
In Antwerp, Belgium, 100% of the hospitalized “COVID cases” are fullyvaccinated persons.
The Hall Turn Radio Show reported that “CEOs and medical directors of Antwerp hospitals met this
week and the mood was worrying. They’re having another COVID outbreak, but this time, ALL the
patients . . . are fully vaccinated.”115
Data from the government health authorities in Scotland showed that the fully COVID-19
vaccinated accounted for 89% of COVID-19 deaths, whilst also accounting for 77% of COVID-19
hospitalizations, and 65% of alleged COVID-19 cases from October 9 through November 5, 2021.116
23
According to the data from Public Health Scotland, for December 18, 2021, to January 14, 2022, the
COVID-19 case rate was 2.5 times greater for those who received two COVID-19 vaccinations than
those who were unvaccinated.117 Over that same period, there was a 5% greater hospitalization rate
for those who had received two COVID-19 vaccines than those who were unvaccinated.118 From
December 11, 2021, to January 7, 2022, there was a 55% greater mortality rate from COVID-19 for
those who received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine compared to those who were
unvaccinated.119
The Expose news site reported on the government statistics from Canada120
showing that the
vaccinated population of Canada account for 89% of all COVID-19 cases, 86% of all COVID-19
hospitalizations, and 90% of all COVID-19 deaths.
COVID-19 Cases in Canada: Between June 6, 2022 and July 3, 2022 in Canada, “the
unvaccinated population accounted for just 11% of Covid-19 cases … whilst the vaccinated
population accounted for 89%, 74% of which were among the triple and quadruple jabbed.”121
COVID-19 Hospitalizationsin Canada: Between June 6, 2022 and July 3, 2022 in Canada,
“the unvaccinated population accounted for just 14% of Covid-19 hospitalisations … month, whilst
the vaccinated population accounted for 86%, 75% of which were among the triple and quadruple
jabbed.”122
24
COVID-19 Deaths in Canada: Between June 6, 2022 and July 3, 2022 in Canada, “the
unvaccinated population accounted for just 10% of Covid-19 deaths … whilst the vaccinated
population accounted for 90%, 87% of which were among the triple and quadruple jabbed.”123
That manifest danger from the COVID-19 vaccines is in the face of evidence that the
COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective. There is study,
124
after study,
125
after study,
126
after study127
proving that vaccinated individuals can still test positive for COVID-19 and manifest illnesses
associated with COVID-19. The United Kingdom Health Security Agency COVID-19 Vaccine
Surveillance Report published on October 21, 2021, reveals that “[i]n individuals aged greater than
30, the rate of a positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to
unvaccinated.”128 The method used by the vaccine makers for reporting the efficacy of the COVID19 vaccines (relative risk reduction) is to subtract the percentage ofinfected vaccinated persons from
the percentage ofinfected unvaccinated persons and divide that number bythe percentage of infected
unvaccinated persons (U-V/U). Using that formula, and applying it to the UK government data, this
author calculated that the actual effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines in the real world is minus64%.129 That means that a vaccinated person is 64% more likely to catch COVID-19 than an
unvaccinated person.130 That calculation of minus-64% COVID-19 vaccine efficacy was from the
25
official reported data of the UK Health Security Agency.
131
In October 2021, the U.S. FDA issued an EUA for a COVID-19 vaccine for children five
years and older, and the U.S. CDC recommended that EUA COVID-19 vaccine for those children.
On March 8, 2022, Florida State Surgeon General Joseph Ladpapo, M.D., Ph.D., contradicted the
U.S. CDC and officially recommended against giving the COVID-19 vaccine to healthy children 5
to 17 years old.132 He made that recommendation based on the limited risk that COVID-19 posed to
the young compared to the “higher than anticipated severe adverse events occurred among those
receiving the COVID-19 vaccine” in clinical trials.133 He revealed the troubling fact that the COVID19 vaccines have no long-term immunity benefit. They don’t work as advertised. Dr. Ladpapo
explained that a “study conducted out of New York determined that COVID-19 vaccine efficacy
declined 84%, from 68% to 12%, over a span of two months for children aged 5 to 11.”134 He further
stated that the “same study determined that COVID-19 vaccine efficacy declined 40%, from 85%
to 51%, over a span of two months for adolescents ages 12 to 17.”135 Despite that evidence, in June
2022, the FDA authorized a COVID-19 vaccine for children older than six months, and the U.S.
CDC recommended that vaccine for those children.136
After pushing millions to get vaccinated, the CDC has now implicitly acknowledged that
vaccines do not have any beneficial effect on preventing the infection or spread of COVID-19. On
September 23, 2022, the CDC guidance was updated to note that “vaccination status is no longer
used to inform source control, screening testing, or post-exposure recommendations.”137
TheCDC and the vaccine makers understood from the beginning that the COVID-19 mRNA
vaccines were ineffective in protecting persons from COVID-19. As the ineffectiveness of the
COVID-19 injections in providing immunitywas becoming increasinglyclear, the CDC realized that
the injections did not meet the definition of a vaccine. Indeed, in a Motion for a Preliminary
Injunction against HHS filed on July 19, 2021, the plaintiffs alleged:
[T]he “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Moderna
COVID-19 Vaccine” do not meet the CDC’s own definitions. They
do not stimulate the body to produce immunity from a disease. They
are a synthetic fragment of nucleic acid embedded in a fat carrier that
is introduced into human cells, not for the purpose of inducing
immunity from infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and not to
block further transmission of the virus, but in order to lessen the
symptoms of COVID-19. No published, peer-reviewed studies prove
that the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Moderna
COVID-19 Vaccine” confer immunity or stop transmission.138
The lawyers for HHS realized that the plaintiffs were correct. They advised their clients at
the HHS component agency, the CDC, that they needed to fix that problem. So many of the laws
protecting pharmaceutical companies from liability required that their injections be vaccines. They
needed to change the very definition of a vaccine to include an injection that is ineffective in
26
producing immunity to the disease.
The CDC defines immunity as “[p]rotection from an infectious disease. If you are immune
to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.”139 So far, so good. Up until
September 2021, the CDC’s definition of “vaccine” was “[a] product that stimulates a person’s
immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that
disease.”140 So it was understood by all before September 2021 that a vaccine “stimulates a person’s
immune system to produce immunity.” And immunity means “[p]rotection from an infectious
disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.”
But in September 2021, that all changed. The CDC changed the definition of vaccine tomean
instead “[a] preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”141
Now, the definition of a vaccine includes a vaccine that merely “stimulates the body’s immune
response” without actuallyproducing any protection from disease.Now, a vaccine can be ineffective
in providing any protection in preventing infection; it only needs to stimulate the body’s immune
response regardless of whether that stimulation is effective in protecting against disease.
In an email response to a news inquiry, a spokesman for the CDC stated: “while there have
been slight changes in wording over time to the definition of ‘vaccine’ on the CDC’s website, those
haven’t impacted the overall definition. … The previous definition…could be interpreted to mean
that vaccines were 100% effective, which has never been the case for any vaccine, so the current
definition is more transparent.”142
The real reason for the changed definition is that since the mRNA vaccines have been such
a spectacular failure, a change in the definition was necessary to account for that failure. For the
CDC to claim that changing the meaning of vaccine from “stimulates a person’s immune system to
produce immunity” to “stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases” is only a slight
change that does not impact the definition is dissimulation of the first order.
If the new definition was not a change, then why do it? There is a world of difference
between producing immunity and simply responding to a disease. Under the new definition, the
body’s response could be, and as we have seen with the mRNA vaccines, has been, ineffective in
fighting off the disease. Before the definition change, a vaccine wasrequired to offer immunity from
the disease; now, all that is needed is for the vaccine to prompt the body’s immune system to respond
to the disease. Indeed, the body could respond to the disease with a cytokine storm (a.k.a.,
antibody-dependent enhancement), which may kill the patient, as we have seen with mRNA
COVID-19 vaccines. Now, the ineffectiveness of vaccines is built into the definition.
A vaccinated person is statistically more likely to be infected with CIVID-19 than an
unvaccinated person. What is the cause of this statistical phenomenon that a vaccinated person is
more likely to catch COVID-19? The UK Health Security Agency data shows that the COVID-19
vaccine efficacy drops at a steady 5% average rate per week.143 One would think that fact would only
indicate that the vaccine is losing efficacy, ultimately dropping to zero. But that is not the case. The
27
hard data from the UK government indicates that, in fact, the 5% loss of efficacy actually continues
past zero. What that means is that the vaccine increases the likelihood of COVID-19.
The UK Health SecurityAgencyCOVID-19 data indicates that the COVID-19 vaccines have
not merely lost their efficiency; they damage and suppress the immune system. Over time, a
vaccinated person is less able to fight off infection and ends up hospitalized. They test positive for
COVID-19 and are labeled a breakthrough COVID case. In fact, they are likely a case of
antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), wherein they are ill not because the vaccine did not work
but because the vaccine worked to make them sick.
It is not that the vaccines are ineffective that is the reason for the COVID-19 infections
among the vaccinated; the vaccines drive an illness called antibody dependent enhancement (ADE).
ADE is being reported as COVID-19 because the patients are testing positive for COIVD-19.
Renowned virologist and Nobel Prize Laureate Prof. Luc Montagnier explained that the so-called
breakthrough COVID-19 infections being suffered by the fully vaccinated persons are infections
caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.144 Dr. Montagnier said that the high rate ofCOVID-19 infections
among the fully vaccinated population is due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
In an April 30, 2021 report filed with the FDA, Pfizer acknowledged that vaccine-associated
enhanced disease (VAED) and vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD) were
listed as “Important Potential Risk[s]” of the COIVD-19 vaccines.145 Pfizer noted that the VAED
may go unreported as such because the patient suffering VAED will usually be presented as having
“severe or unusual manifestations of COVID-19.”146 Thus the announced “breakthrough” cases of
COVID-19 are likely not COVID-19 cases but are rather cases of VAED, otherwise known by the
acronym ADE, caused by the COVID-19 vaccines themselves.
Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., M.S., the inventor of the mRNA technology used by
Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna in their COVID-19 vaccines, states that the COVID-19 vaccines are
causing ADE. Dr. Malone indicates that the scientific evidence is becoming increasingly clear that
the COVID-19 vaccines are causing the virus to replicate at higher levels than would be the case in
the absence of the vaccination.147 He said that this phenomenon of ADE was predictable because
ADE has happened in every coronavirus study ever conducted. He said the data indicates that as the
immune response from the COVID-19 vaccines wanes aftersix months, the ADE is kicking in, and
we see the result with increased hospitalizations. The hospitalizations are not from breakthrough
infectionsin those vaccinated but rather from ADE brought on bythe vaccine itself. The ADE causes
the virus to replicate more efficiently than it would otherwise. Dr. Malone further states that those
in the vaccinated population are generating the delta variant of COVID-19 due to the COVID-19
vaccine.
One research study explained:
There are also immunopathological complications associated with the
SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines that require addressing and
28
further optimization. One adverse effect is the induction of
antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) effect, which is usually
caused byvaccine-induced suboptimal antibodies that facilitates viral
entry into host cells.148
A study was conducted by Timothy Cardozo of the Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Langone Health, New York, and Ronald Veazey of the Division of
Comparative Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University
School of Medicine, Tulane National Primate Research Center. The scientists determined in their
research that the COVID-19 vaccines caused an increase in the risk of more severe diseases caused
through ADE. They concluded that recipients of COVID-19 vaccines should be warned about all the
dangers of ADE before being vaccinated. The scientists determined that the COVID-19 vaccines
worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). They were concerned that
the dangers are kept secret in clinical trial protocols and consent forms.149
Many other researchers have determined that the COVD-19 vaccines pose a clear danger of
ADE. In another study, the researchers concluded:
Antibody-based drugs and vaccines against severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are being expedited through
preclinical and clinical development. Data from the study of
SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that
anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through
antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).150
Another researcher pleaded for caution in the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine:
[B]ecause ADE of disease cannot be reliably predicted after either
vaccination or treatment with antibodies-regardless of what virus is
the causative agent-it will be essential to depend on careful analysis
of safety in humans as immune interventions for COVID-19 move
forward.151
Sadly, the researcher’s warningwas not heeded.Amassive studyinvolving vaccine data from
hundreds of countries proves that the COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant increase in total
cases and deaths associated with COVID-19.152
The study proves that the COVID-19 vaccines are
not only ineffective, but they are driving illness and death. The study showed that the COVID-19
vaccines have caused a whopping 38% more COVID-19 cases and an even more astonishing 31%
increase in deaths from COVID-19 in the United States.153 But that is only the tip of the iceberg
because many patients suffering ADE may not test positive for COVID-19. They still suffer the
consequences of the ailments caused by the vaccine-induced ADE.
The American Liberty Report revealed that “more than 18 million people were injured so
29
badly by their first COVID shot from Pfizer or Moderna that they had to go to the hospital. That’s
according to the CDC’s own internal data, which a court just ordered the federal agency to release
to a watchdog group.”154 The CDC started a vaccine monitoring program using a software
application called V-safe at the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in December of 2020.
Ten million people downloaded the V-safe app on their cell phones. Those people then reported
adverse events from the COVID-19 vaccines through the V-safe app.TheCDC received the data and
tracked it for the first 18 months until July 2022. Strangely, the CDC never published the data.
You would think that the data showed that the COVID-19 vaccines were safe, since CDC’s
main webpage about the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines says, to this day, “COVID-19 vaccines are safe,
effective and free.”155
Indeed, that is what the CDC has been saying all along. But that was not true,
and the CDC knew it. A court ordered the CDC to release its V-safe data. It showed that there were
800,000 receivngmedical care out of 10million people.156 That translates to an 8% medical care rate.
Approximately 73% of those seeking medical care needed to visit urgent care, the emergency room,
or be hospitalized. Extrapolating to the population of 230 million people who received the vaccine
in the U.S., we find that 18 million of them received medical care for injuries caused by the COVID19 vaccines.
Myocarditis
Peter McCullough, M.D., and Dr. Jessica Rose, Ph.D., researched the sudden appearance of
myocarditis in young people. Dr. McCullough is a highly-published world-renowned cardiologist,
and Dr. Rose is a Canadian researcher with a Bachelor’s Degree in Applied Mathematics and a
Master’s degree in Immunologyfrom Memorial Universityof Newfoundland. She also holds a Ph.D.
inComputational Biologyfrom Bar Ilan University and two Post Doctoral degrees: one in Molecular
Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and one in Biochemistry from the Technion
Institute of Technology. Drs. McCullough andRose determined that the COVID-19 vaccines caused
myocarditis. While their study focused on young people, their conclusions also apply to the
population as a whole. The McCullough & Rose report revealed the following startling facts.
Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the
12-15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number
of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over
background myocarditis rates for this age group.157
Their report labeled the myocarditis caused by the vaccines “COVID-19-Injection-Related
Myocarditis (CIRM);” the report concluded:
Thus, due to both the problems of under-reporting and the known lag
in report processing, this analysis reveals a strong signal from the
VAERS data that the risk of suffering CIRM
[COVID-19-Injection-Related Myocarditis] – especially males is
unacceptably high. Again, children are not a high-risk group for
30
COVID-19 respiratoryillness, and yet they are the high-risk group for
CIRM.158
The McCullough & Rose report caused quite a stir in the medical community. After the
preliminary draft of their report was peer-reviewed and approved for publication, it was posted by
the publisher on its NIH website. Shortly thereafter, the publisher, Elsevier, without giving a reason,
suddenly withdrew the publication. Dr. McCullough is reportedly pursuing legal action against
Elsevier for its unlawful actions.
In its guidance dated October 4, 2022, the U.S. CDC recommended COVID-19 vaccines for
all persons over six months old.159
On October 7, 2022, Dr. Ladpapo, M.D., Ph.D., in his capacity
as Florida Surgeon General, contradicted the U.S. CDC and announced that the risks of COVID-19
vaccines outweigh the benefits for 18 to 39-year-old males. He came to that conclusion based on a
scientific study of the mortality risk of the COVID-19 vaccines. That study “found there is an 84%
increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28
days following mRNA vaccination.”160
Sudden Adult Death Syndrome
The ADE suffered by vaccine recipients is causing them to unexpctedly die in large numbers.
The sudden deaths of young people in the prime of health cannot be ignored. The prevalence ofthose
deaths is forcing the hand of the media to report on them. But the mass media is trying to conceal
the cause of the sudden deaths of thousands of young people by labeling the deaths “sudden adult
death syndrome (SADS). It is sometimes also called “sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS).
The medical establishment and the media engage in all sorts of conjecture, including blaming the
sudden premature deaths on a genetic condition.161 But they do not ever mention the elephant in the
room, the COVID-19 vaccines, as a suspected cause for the deaths. Ethan Huff, writing for Natural
News, explains:
In an attempt to explain away the rash of deaths occurring in
otherwise healthy-seeming adults who got “vaccinated” for the
Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), the medical establishment has
coined a newterm called “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome,” or SADS,
that it is pretending appeared out of nowhere with no explanation.162
Much like Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), which was also
made up out of thin air to explain away infant deaths caused by
vaccines, SADS is being called a “mystery” condition that could
strike anyone at any time for no apparent reason.163
It is quite strange that the apparent culprits, the COVID-19 vaccines, are not even mentioned
in the major media. They report the sudden premature deaths and essentially leave the readers to
guess why young people are keeling over dead in the prime of their lives. Ethan Huff explains the
31
obvious:
They will never admit to it, but the sudden rise in SADS directly
coincides with the unleashing of Operation Warp Speed, which has
turned hundreds of millions of Americans into deadly spike protein
factories. These spike proteins are ripping apart their cardiovascular
systems and leaving them prone to early death.164
All Vaccines are Dangerous Medical Quackery That Cause Disease
The COVID-19 vaccine is not an anomaly. It is just the most recent vaccine atrocity.
Vaccination is medical quackery.
165 But because vaccinations fulfill the perverted ends of Satan and
his minions, the practice flourishes. Vaccines are unsafe and ineffective. One suppressed study
proves that “vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated.”166
The chart below shows the “[c]umulative office visits in the vaccinated (orange) vs.
unvaccinated (blue) patients born into [Dr. Paul Thomas’ pediatric] practice: the clarity of the
age-specific differences in the health fates of individuals who are vaccinated (2763) compared to the
561 unvaccinated in patients born into the practice over ten years is most strikingly clear in this
comparison of the cumulative numbers of diagnoses in the two patient groups. The number of office
visits for the unvaccinated is adjusted by a sample size multiplier factor (4.9) to the expected value
as if the number of unvaccinated in the study was the same as the number of vaccinated.”167
32
Rhoda Wilson reveals in the April 11, 2022, edition of The Expose a groundbreaking study
comparing the health of a group of 1,482 unvaccinated adults and children to the national statistics
on the health of vaccinated adults.168 The study conducted by an organization called The Control
Group reveals that unvaccinated adults are significantly healthier than vaccinated adults.169
33
The Control Group filed a complaint in federal court seeking a declaratory judgment and
injunctive relief against the federal government alleging its vaccine laws, regulations, and policies
are unscientific and violate the constitutional rights of the people.170 But their complaint was
dismissed and “on October 3, 2022, the US Supreme Court denied The Control Group’s petition for
writ of certiorari. So this health freedom case is now closed.”171
Despite the failure of the Control Group in court, the facts that they established in their study
will have a long-term benefit to all who seek justice in the future. The study is robust and
unimpeachable. Dr. Stephen Malthouse states:
Every so often a study comes along that shakes the bedrock of
medicine. The Control Group compared unvaccinated adults to
vaccinated adults in the US and what they discovered is incredible.
Perhaps one of the most surprising findings is that vit K shots,
containing aluminum in most cases (although not always disclosed on
the list of ingredients), played a significant role in adult (and
childhood) chronic disease. If you get rid of vit K shots and all
vaccinations, the incidence of heart disease, asthma, autism, and other
severe disorders goes practically to zero.172
Below is a sample of some of the charts that were filed as exhibits in the litigation by the
Control Group.
34
35
36
37
38
Yet another study in 2020 came up with the same results. The study found that vaccinated
children were much sicker than unvaccinated children. The researchers concluded:
In this study, based on a convenience sample of children born into
one of three distinct pediatric medical practices, higher ORs [odds
ratios] were observed within the vaccinated versus unvaccinated
group for developmental delays, asthma and ear infections.173
The 2017 Mawson study comparing the health of vaccinated children to the health of
unvaccinated children arrived at the conclusion that the vaccinated children were much less healthy
than the unvaccinated children.174
Mark Blaxill and Amy Becker studied mortality rates during the COVID-19 lock-downs.175
They discovered a startling fact. Infant mortality actually went down during the COVID-19
lockdowns. There was a significant decrease in the number of infant deaths. Blaxill and Becker
attributed that drop to the inability of parents to do well-baby doctor checkups with the obligatory
vaccinations. Fewer vaccines = fewer infant deaths. Blaxill and Becker stated:
Starting in early March, expected deaths [for children under 18 years
old] began a sharp decline, from an expected level of around 700
deaths per week to well under 500 bymid-April and throughout May.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for
Health Statistics Mortality Surveillance System.
39
As untimely deaths spiked among the elderly in Manhattan nursing
homes and in similar settings all over the country, something
mysterious was saving the lives of children. As springtime in
America came along with massive disruptions in family life amid
near-universal lockdowns, roughly 30% fewer children died.
***
Was this a protective effect of school closures? Were teenagers
getting themselves into risky situations at a lower rate? No. There was
very little effect among school age children or adolescents.176
Incidentally, since the publication of Blaxill and Becker’s article, the CDC has removed the
page that memorialized the fact that almost all of the reduction in childhood deaths came from
infants. Blaxill and Becker explain that the CDC statistics showed:
Virtually the entire change came from infants. Somehow, the
changing pattern of American life during the lockdowns has been
saving the lives of hundreds of infants, over 200 per week.
***
What has changed during this period that might have such an effect?
***
One very clear change that has received publicity is that public health
officials are bemoaning the sharp decline in infant vaccinations as
parents are not taking their infants into pediatric offices for their
regular well-baby checks. In the May 15 [2020] issue of the CDC
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), a group of
authors from the CDC and Kaiser Permanente reported a sharp
decline in provider orders for vaccines as well as a decline in
pediatric vaccine doses administered. Santoli, Jeanne M et al.
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Routine Pediatric Vaccine
Ordering and Administration — United States, 2020. cdc.gov.177
[Online] May 15, 2020. These declines began in early March, around
the time infant deaths began declining.
178
40
Figure 9: Chart showing a precipitous drop in child deaths early in 2020 that correlated
directly with the COVID-19 lookdowns. Virtually the entire drop in deaths among
children under 18 years old came from infants. The COVID-19 lockdowns prevented
parents from taking infants for well-baby checkups and getting vaccinated. The reduction
in infant deaths also correlated directly with a sharp decline in provider orders for
vaccines and a decline in pediatric vaccine doses administered.
Lest you think that the above quoted doctors and their studies are anomalies, please
understand that doctors and scientists through the centuries have witnessed first-hand the injuries
caused by vaccines and have been speaking out against that superstitious practice.