CHINESE SPIES STEAL MIRACLE VACCINE FROM USA COMPANY

Part Two: The Framing of Dr. French Anderson

– by National Security Commentator Mark Adams

“After 8 years in prison, I can say that I would not wish the evil of prison life on my worst enemy.” – Dr. French Anderson

As explained in Part One China’s brazen spy operation to steal a strategically important ANTI-RADIATION vaccine never would have succeeded if not for the rampant and corrosive corruption in the American courts.

The sole evidence in Anderson’s 2006 trial that got him convicted was a sting meeting recording made by the alleged victim, YH, that took place July 1, 2004 on the lawn of the Pasadena library. During the meeting YH was wearing a concealed ADS Mono8A police audio recorder to surreptitiously memorialize the encounter.

Anderson’s original defense attorney believed that, as the Sheriff’s Department boisterously insisted, police recordings on their specialized equipment could not be altered. Accordingly, he refused to have the recording analyzed despite strident pleas from Anderson that the LASD recording did not accurately portray the events that occurred.

It is a matter of record that LASD Deputy John Powell formally issued an angry denial of evidence tampering and vehemently declared that the recording was pristine and accurate:

“Defense Counsel continues to make erroneous and misleading assumptions about the audio evidence in this case and, in my opinion, has deliberately tried to hinder and delay the judicial process, while indirectly maligning and wrongfully accusing members of the LASD of misconduct…. Defense Counsel has chosen to engage in a calculated campaign of deception and time wasting, by offering ludicrous arguments that insult my intelligence.”

In the intervening years since the 2004 recording was issued, several technology experts have gone on record in support of Anderson’s claim that the recording was deliberately and malevolently altered by the LASD.

According to the journal Digital Evidence, “The recording was intentionally made without the use of the authenticity protocol, and was instrumental in the conviction of a crime. The client’s position is that the recording was edited and his lawyers have marshaled substantial evidence to that effect.

“His original lawyer did not object to the admission of the recording into evidence. The client now wants a new trial, on the basis that his lawyer did not protect his rights. The original lawyer did nothing relating to the authenticity of recording.”

Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review Volume 10: 2013

 http://journals.sas.ac.uk/deeslr/article/view/2020/1957

In 2011, five long years after Anderson’s imprisonment, Tracer Technology, Inc. President Curtis Crowe, a digital recording expert who has worked with agencies including the CIA, FBI and the DEA, analyzed the LASD recording and concluded it was maliciously tampered:

“I believe sincerely that the recording was taken to the police station, analyzed, edited and then entered into their computer with a false time and date. My feeling is that on this situation….French has been the victim of unethical behavior by the police.”

https://www.ini-world-report.org/2015/02/28/anderson-asserts-innocence/

Dr. Yi Xu, a Professor of Speech Sciences at University College, London England is an internationally recognized expert in the field of speech prosody, i.e., the analysis of human speech to determine what is authentic and what is fraudulent. After analyzing the LASD recording Professor Xu’s concluded:

“In my 40 years of experience in research on human speech, it is my opinion that this recording should never have been admitted or used in any legal proceeding, because it is false, has been altered, and is not authentic.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-301/326024/20240916113245522_Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Certiorari%20Anderson.pdf  App 40

Unfortunately that is not how the court ruled. Rather than address the significant issues raised by every single expert who examined the police recording court officials circled the wagons and dismissed the expert’s conclusions:

“Petitioner has submitted declarations by three purported experts, none of whom profess a specialized background in digital recording issues.”

That ruling was issued in 2012. Twelve long years later the LASD recording was examined once again this time by international digital recording expert Bruce Lebovitz using powerful new technology he invented and submitted for patent protection in 2022.

In his 2024 conclusion Lebovitz did not mince words:

“The recording is not an authentic recording of the actual conversation. It has been significantly and materially altered. It has no probative value.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-301/326024/20240916113245522_Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Certiorari%20Anderson.pdf  App 37

Lebovitz’s conclusion is powerful reinforcement of the findings Curtis Crowe and Dr. Xu declared twelve long years earlier.

Regarding Sergeant Powell’s raucous denials of evidence tampering a 2024 Court Petition noted:

“Det. Ebert’s supervisor, Sergeant Powell, in a declaration to the court on 12/20/10 (4 years after the trial) stated that the Sheriff’s Department standard policy for years was to bypass the manufacturer’s procedure that would guarantee no editing because it was too time consuming.”

Really? The Petition also states:

“However, the manufacturer’s procedure would have taken no longer than Det. Ebert took in downloading the recording incorrectly (i.e., in a way that allowed editing). Therefore, the LASD policy ensured that audio recordings could be edited.”

The Petition continues with:

“The stated policy of Sgt. Powell of the LASD is disturbing. Det. Ebert wrote that he had worked on ‘thousands of recordings’ and that he ‘would often enhance a recording for investigators.’”

Finally, the Petition concludes with:

“THIS ACTIVITY WAS CLEARLY CARRIED OUT AS AN LASD POLICY, NOT THE MISCONDUCT OF ONE DETECTIVE.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-301/326024/20240916113245522_Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Certiorari%20Anderson.pdf  App.48

With this in mind let’s circle back to the lower court’s refusal to grant Anderson an evidentiary hearing in 2012. Specifically the court determined:

Petitioner has submitted declarations by three purported experts, none of whom profess a specialized background in digital recording issues.”

What an extraordinary statement! Curtis Crowe was the developer of Diamond Cut DC-8 which at the time was the most advanced software in existence for the analysis of digital recordings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8es8iIJF65Y

Curtis Crowe ~ Developer Diamond Cut DC-8 software

To claim that Crowe does not “profess a specialized background in digital recording issues” is nothing less than a vile spit-in-your-face pejorative insult.

Now that LASD’s policy regarding the lack of preservation of integrity of their clandestine recordings is revealed is it not painfully clear why Dr. Anderson was denied an evidentiary hearing? Would the acquittal of French Anderson trigger a tsunami of Habeus Corpus lawsuits? Would it be a deathblow to the – already tarnished – reputation of the LASD?

Nota Bene:

In 2013, 21 LASD deputy sheriffs were been indicted, 7 were convicted, 14 others were being tried, the Sheriff, Lee Baca, was forced to resign and later was indicted and convicted.

https://calcoastnews.com/2013/12/18-l-county-sheriffs-deputies-arrested/

https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/six-current-and-former-los-angeles-sheriff-s-deputies-sentenced-federal-prison

https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/18-charged-result-federal-investigation-corruption-and-civil-rights-abuses-members-la

https://www.foxla.com/news/former-sheriff-lee-baca-found-guilty-on-corruption-charges

He [Sheriff Baca] is the ninth person [in the LASD] to be convicted and sentenced to prison …

https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-baca-sentenced-jail-sheriff-corruption-20170512-story.html

Apparently the LASD remains a hotbed of corruption. Consider this 2024 headline:

LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Guilty verdicts — across the board. Six Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department officials — deputies, sergeants and lieutenants — were all found guilty Tuesday of conspiracy and obstruction of justice. The two sergeants were also found guilty of making false statements for lying to the FBI.

https://abc7.com/post/lasd-trial-6-defendants-guilty-on-all-counts/150423/

The bizarre notion that the LASD would do nothing illegal does not stand up to the overwhelming evidence that Anderson and his investigators have amassed. Evidence that clearly  establishes malicious and flagrantly, outrageous governmental misconduct.

When Dr. Anderson discovered a potential billion-dollar cancer treatment drug, his USC colleague Dr. Zhao chose to steal it and take it to China. She was unsuccessful until she had her then 17-year-old daughter claim that Dr. Anderson had sexually molested her when she was thirteen. That accusation, supported by the maliciously altered sting meeting recording, resulted in Anderson’s arrest, conviction, and a 14 year prison sentence in 2006.

One Anderson was dispensed with, Zhao took the cancer treatment and gene therapy discoveries together with trade secrets to China where she launched her own company, KLT Pharmaceuticals.

In addition to lauding the superb cancer treatment value of the coveted IL-12-based cancer treatment drug the latest version of KLT’s web site portrays it as an anti-radiation vaccine openly promoting its great strategic significance for China’s national defense security.

KLT web site: http://kltbiopharm.cn/EN/product.aspx :

The results of a joint study between KLT Pharmaceuticals and the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, P.L.A. China show that KLT-1101 can significantly improve the survival rate of primates within 24 hours after nuclear radiation exposure and without subsequent medical support. This product will greatly improve China’s nuclear emergency drug reserve level, enhance the rescue efficiency of major nuclear accidents, increase the protection and handling capacity of public safety emergencies, and safeguard the peaceful development and utilization of atomic energy, which has great strategic significance for national defense security.

Ever since the sabotage, arrest and conviction of French Anderson the United States has done next to nothing to capitalize on his stellar discoveries stemming back to the turn of the 21st Century.

What about French Anderson? Since his release from prison his sole purpose is to prove to the world that he is not a child molester. Anything else is a distraction.